Testseek.nl hebben 212 deskundige overzichten van Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 verzameld en de gemiddelde classificatie is 90%. Scrol en zie neer alle overzichten voor Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
April 2012
(90%)
212 Reviews
Gemiddelde score van experts die dit product hebben beoordeeld.
Gebruikers
(96%)
759 Reviews
Gemiddelde score van eigenaren van het product.
900100212
De redactie beviel
Hoog bruikbaar dynamisch bereik
Lage ruisgevoeligheid tot 6.400 ISO
Goede kleurweergave
Zeer goed AF systeem
'Slechts' 22 MP beeldpixels
Goede video specificaties
Zeer sille sluiter in silent mode
Nieuw 61 Punts AF wat erg prettig werkt
Auto ISO opties
Hogere ISO's
Snelheid
6 FPS
Extra card slot voor SD
Fullframesensor met goede ruisonderdrukking
Uitgebreide videomogelijkheden
6 bps burstmode in hoogste resolutie met autofocus
1080p
30bps videomogelijkheid
De redactie beviel het niet
'Slechts' 22 MP beeldpixels
Middelmatige witbalans
Hoge adviesprijs
AF systeem vraagt gewenning
Scherm niet draaibaar of kantelbaar
Trage AF in live view
Geen AF in video modus
Prijs is vrij hoog ivm de concurentie
Geen flits (voor snel even in flitsen of remote aansturing van losse flitsers)
Improved AF performance. Excellent image quality. Headphone monitoring. Improved video quality with low moire and artefacts. Excellent high ISO performance
Repositioned buttons may annoy Mark II upgraders. No clean HDMI output. Video and images straight from camera can benefit from a small amount of sharpening
Packed full of improvements for photographers, Canon has proved that you can improve on an already-strong formula with the 5D Mark III....
Samenvatting: Because the Mark II still has plenty to offer to both serious enthusiasts and professional photographers, it will remain on sale, at a reduced price of AUD$2799 for the body or AUD$3899 for the Premium kit with the 24-105mm lens, as we reviewed. As such, ...
Excellent HDR mode, Detailed raw and JPG files, High quality images, Low noise
Complicated AF system, A bit pricey
Buying Guide Best DSLR: top cameras by price and brand While the key specification changes since the 5D Mark II largely just bring the Canon EOS 5D Mark III into line with Canon's existing DSLRs, we're impressed with the results from the new camera. Raw a...
Samenvatting: Build and Ergonomics Canon says the new camera represents a complete redesign but, physically, there's not a huge difference between the EOS 5D Mark III and EOS 5D Mark II, although the Mark III is slightly larger and heavier. The table below compares key...
Samenvatting: As impressive as its specifications are, in actual use, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is simply put a superlative full frame camera whose ease of use belies its dazzling array of features.Like the top of the range EOS 1D X, the 22.3 megapixel Mark III spor...
The advancement in AF system is undoubtedly the best thing about the Mark III, the noise performance is really good too, along with great features like auto sharpening of images. Overall the Canon EOS 5D Mark III's JPEG output across the ISO range offers ...
Weatherproof Sturdy built, Better ISO range, Improved AF module, Inbuilt Noise Reduction, Outstanding Image & Video quality, DIGIC 5processorEnhanced performance
Popup flash missing, Slightly over priced, Does not support EFS lenses
As mentioned above, Canon 5D Mark III delivers great performance as well as good configurability; but with competition like Nikon D800 in the market, this one from Canon seems a little overpriced. Still, even with a price tag of Rs.211455 (body only) 5D M...
Amazing AF system, Good high ISO still and video performance, lighter body with weather sealing, Silent jog dial for uninterrupted audio recording
Quite pricey compared to the camera it replaces and competes with, Noise in video is quite unpleasant (above ISO 8000 in low light)
Superficially, one could say there isn't much of a difference between the predecessor and what succeeds it. Even the pixel count is a meager jump. So why would you want to pay such a significantly higher price for the Mark III? What we have here is a foc...
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?
(80%)
Gepubliceerd: 2012-03-28, Auteur: Michael , beoordeeld door: gizmodo.in
Samenvatting: Canon and Nikon both have brand new professional DLSR cameras fighting for the wallets of photographers and videographers the world over. We recently reviewed the Canon 5D Mark III, and are whipping up a review of the Nikon D800. In the meantime, we put t...
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?
-
Gepubliceerd: 2012-03-23, Auteur: Andrew , beoordeeld door: gizmodo.in
First and foremost, the 5D Mark III takes beautiful photos, and improves on a camera that was already fantastic. The small changes on its body make the Mark III even more comfortable to use, while the tweaks made to button placement and the layout of its
Given how popular the 5D Mark II became in the videography community, we'd have liked to have seen the Mark III's video capabilities improved a bit more. The addition of a dedicated XLR microphone jack is probably a pipe dream, but a 60P mode at 1920x1080
You should! Yeah, the Mark II is still a killer deal, but the 5D Mark III is better. Thats all there is to it. The refinements just make it a vastly better tool for photographers and videographers. The autofocus system alone is enough to justify choosin...
