nl.testseek.com  

 
 
Zoek:   
 

Home » Computers » Processors » AMD » AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Bezig
Wacht alstublieft...

  Expert beoordelingen    

Reviews of AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.nl hebben 64 deskundige overzichten van AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus verzameld en de gemiddelde classificatie is 82%. Scrol en zie neer alle overzichten voor AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Meest Awarded March 2015
March 2015
 
(82%)
64 Reviews
Gebruikers
(94%)
44 Reviews
82 0 100 64

 

Reviews

pagina 3 van 7
Bestellen via:
Score
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-01-21, Auteur: Mark , beoordeeld door: overclock3d.net

  • When AMD first released CPUs for their AM3+ platform we at OC3D were not overly impressed, behind the hype of AMD's "Bulldozer" architecture was some very power hungry, hot running and under-performing CPUs. When AMD's second generation of FX CPUs, Pile...

Lees de volledige beoordeling »
 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-01-20, Auteur: Ian , beoordeeld door: anandtech.com

  • Anyone building a new performance system today is not exactly spoiled for choice. On the super extreme end, native octo-core processors with threading are in the market. AMD's high end FX models start by comparison to the Core i5 line but boasts double th...

Lees de volledige beoordeling »
 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-01-08, beoordeeld door: lanoc.org

  • After spending time with both the AMD FX-8320E and the MSI 970 Gaming I came out with a mostly positive outlook. For starters, the board is packed full of features and is selling for a great price. When you combine the board with the FX-8320E you have a...

Lees de volledige beoordeling »
 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-01-04, Auteur: David , beoordeeld door: benchmarkreviews.com

  • 8 cores for not much cash, Overclockabilty, Strong performance in heavily threaded workloads, Potential performance win with DX12, No real reason to spend more for an FX9590
  • Far behind Intel on a percore basis, Powerhungry even at stock clock speeds, Aggressively throttles when overclocked via turbo multiplier
  • There is no “fastest processor”. When planning your rig, you'll need to make a choice between core count and clock speed . Up until now, the argument for choosing more cores has boiled down to whether or not you regularly perform tasks that spawn lots of ...

 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-01-02, Auteur: Heath , beoordeeld door: proclockers.com

  • Excellent Multi-threading Performance, Very Reasonable Price, Strong Overclocking Potential
  • Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
  • The new AMD FX 8320E is far from ground breaking. It does not really need to be either. Its multi-threading prowess would make the Intel i3 an easy target. The FX 8320E is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It's mild 3.2 GHz base clock and low power label makes ...

 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2014-12-23, Auteur: Hilbert , beoordeeld door: guru3d.com

  • I rather have four cores that are twice as fast per core opposed to 8 cores that are slower, so again I'll say this, personally I would have preferred a faster per core performing AMD quad-core processor. realistically, we have been working with the FX 8...

Lees de volledige beoordeling »
 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2018-05-05, Auteur: Phil , beoordeeld door: pctechreviews.com.au

  • I wouldn't be buying this CPU to run at stock speeds. This is a CPU that is sensibly priced and gives bang for buck, especially if you're happy to slap an above average cooler on it and overclock it to around the 4.5GHz mark. As with all overclocking, you...

 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-02-27, Auteur: Dave , beoordeeld door: techradar.com/au/

  • A decent upgrade for an existing AMD setup, relatively cheap
  • Old, old tech, still more powerhungry than Intel, no native USB 3.0 or PCIe support
  • The cheapest eight-threaded CPU around, but there are better options if you don't need that sort of multi-threaded capability....

 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
(70%)
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-09-03, Auteur: BluePanda , beoordeeld door: overclockersclub.com

  • Lower TDP = lower heat, Good single threaded performance (given the TDP), Good overclocking results!, Good gaming performance, Cheap!
  • Multicore performance suffers due to lower TDP
  • How to summarize the FX-8320E and MSI 970 Gaming? In short, they're a perfect pair. For a price lower than any of the Intel CPUs alone, you can get both a very good CPU for general use and gaming, as well as a damn fine motherboard to go with it... along...

Lees de volledige beoordeling »
 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Gepubliceerd: 2015-05-13, beoordeeld door: ocdrift.com

  • Good value for money, Acceptable multi-threaded performance, Unlocked multiplier that allows overclocking, Good temperature, Compatible with existing AM3+ motherboards
  • Poor single-threaded performance, Relatively high power consumption even at stock clock, Draw of luck in getting a good overclocking chip, Limited memory overclocking, AMD FX-8320E received Silver Award from OCDrift.com, Disclaimer: OCDrift.com gives out
  • AboutLatest Postsowikh84OverClocker, Reviewer at OCDrift.comOne of the most respected OverClocker here in Malaysia with vast knowledge in Motherboard, Graphics Card and Memory. The nick "owikh84" is not only well known in local tech sites but also interna...

 
Was deze beoordeling nuttig?   
 
  Award


(100%)
    pagina 3 van 7 « Vorige   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Volgende »  
 
Meer populaire producten van dezelfde categorie