Testseek.nl hebben 73 deskundige overzichten van Nikon Z fc verzameld en de gemiddelde classificatie is 81%. Scrol en zie neer alle overzichten voor Nikon Z fc.
August 2021
(81%)
73 Reviews
Gemiddelde score van experts die dit product hebben beoordeeld.
Of de camera voor jou geschikt is, dat kun je natuurlijk alleen zelf beantwoorden. Ik vond de Nikon Z fc prettig in het gebruik, mede door de fysieke sluitertijdenknop.Bovendien wil het oog ook wat. Een camera mag er best wel mooi en aantrekkelijk uitzien...
Gepubliceerd: 2021-09-14, Auteur: Dre , beoordeeld door: digifotopro.nl
De Z fc is een zeer aangename verrassing. Ik had bij geruchte wel vernomen dat Nikon met een retro-camera zou komen, maar ik had niet verwacht dat het een opvolger van de Z 50 zou zijn (al blijft die dan leverbaar). Je koopt dus een spiegelloze APS-camera...
Samenvatting: Het ontwerp van het pentaprisma en de balans tussen zwarte en zilveren elementen op de camerabody van de Nikon Z fc vormen een afspiegeling van de klassieke FM2. Ook zie je er overigens duidelijk elementen van de fullframe Df dslr in terug (die nu uit pro...
Gepubliceerd: 2021-12-27, Auteur: Mike , beoordeeld door: pocket-lint.com
Fairly priced entry into Z mount,Decent image quality potential - if you invest in the right lens,Retro dial-based controls
Plasticky build quality,Slow kit lens doesn't represent camera's true capability,Autofocus not a patch on Canon's EOS R,Not full-frame - just to avoid any doubts
From afar the Nikon Z Fc is certainly eye-catching, bringing retro appeal in its design ethos. Problem is, up close, it's rather plasticky and not a patch on Fujifilm's longer-established X series range in terms of build. Furthermore, as we thought when t...
Gepubliceerd: 2021-09-09, Auteur: Tim , beoordeeld door: techradar.com
Beautiful design, Useful vari-angle touch screen, A well-struck balance of old and new, Great value
Needs more native lenses, Grip less suited to large lenses, No UHS-II support
The Nikon Z fc is a triumph of design that offers a different shooting experience to the Nikon Z50 at a great price. The vari-angle screen is also an inspired choice that embodies Nikon's old-meets-new 'fusion' concept. More advanced photographers might m...
Retro styling will appeal to Nikon fans, Fine image quality up to ISO 12,800 at least, Large, clear viewfinder and fully articulated screen, Excellent autofocus performance
Slightly bulkier than its APS-C rivals, Very limited DX-format Z-mount lens options, Kit lenses don't have aperture rings, Slab-shaped, grip-less body handles awkwardly, Auto ISO can only be engaged via the menu, Very few updates compared to the Z 50
With its two-tone retro styling and analogue top-plate dials, the Nikon Z fc represents a radical departure from the firms previous Z-mount models. In many ways theres a lot to like; its quick and responsive, has a fine viewfinder and screen, and is ca...
Retro styling will appeal to Nikon fans, Fine image quality up to ISO 12,800 at least, Large, clear viewfinder and fully articulated screen, Excellent autofocus performance
Slightly bulkier than its APS-C rivals, Very limited DX-format Z-mount lens options, Kit lenses don't have aperture rings, Slab-shaped, grip-less body handles awkwardly, Auto ISO can only be engaged via the menu, Very few updates compared to the Z 50
With its two-tone retro styling and analogue top-plate dials, the Nikon Z fc represents a radical departure from the firms previous Z-mount models. In many ways theres a lot to like; its quick and responsive, has a fine viewfinder and screen, and is ca...
Gepubliceerd: 2021-08-10, Auteur: Sam , beoordeeld door: stuff.tv
Striking old-school looks, Great autofocus performance, Useful flippy screen
No in-body image stabilisation, Not many retro-style Nikkor lenses (yet), No headphone input
The Z fc isn't a cutting-edge camera – you'll find more advanced features and better performance on similarly priced cameras from Fujifilm, Panasonic and Sony – but it doesn't disgrace itself at all on the image quality front. At the same time, its retro...
